Исходное сообщение
"Сравнение производительности оконных менеджеров KDE, OpenBox, XFCE и Enlightenment " Отправлено Аноним, 08-Янв-09 15:25
"Jose writes: 19 hours ago # Let me be skeptical about the results of this benchmark. The x11perf program measures the performance of the X server not of the window manager or any other application that happens to be running. From the x11perf man page: "The x11perf program runs one or more performance tests and reports how fast an X server can execute the tests." That being said I really can't explain why you get such different results, since the same X server is running in all tests. Could be due to different background jobs running during the different tests (any tracker, mlocate jobs or random cron jobs?). In any case I really doubt you are measuring window manager performance."

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	> "Jose writes: > 19 hours ago # > Let me be skeptical about the results of this benchmark. > The x11perf program measures the performance of the X server not of > the window manager or any other application that happens to be > running. From the x11perf man page: "The x11perf program runs one > or more performance tests and reports how fast an X server > can execute the tests." > That being said I really can't explain why you get such different > results, since the same X server is running in all tests. > Could be due to different background jobs running during the different > tests (any tracker, mlocate jobs or random cron jobs?). In any > case I really doubt you are measuring window manager performance."
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: